Open your resume and count the bullets that start with "responsible for," "managed," or "worked on." Those lines describe the job you were given. They'd read exactly the same if you'd been mediocre at it, and the person skimming has no way to tell the difference.
This article covers what a strong bullet actually contains, and a stack of before and after rewrites you can copy the pattern from. It also covers how to find a number when you're sure you don't have one, what to do when the work has no metric, and what to cut. Work through your current role first, since that's the section people read most closely and the one where you remember the details.
Most of the advice here comes from Ethan Evans, a retired Amazon VP who spent 15 years there and ran more than 40 "Real Resume Review" episodes where he opens a real person's resume on screen and rewrites it live. Deb Liu, CEO of Ancestry and formerly a VP at Facebook, and Lauren Ipsen, who recruits senior executives at Daversa Partners, fill in the parts about finding and rehearsing your own evidence. Every quote plays the exact moment it was said.
Start with what changed because you were there
Reviewing a technical program manager's resume, Evans walked through the STAR structure that good companies interview with, situation, task, action, result, and pointed out that most people write the first three and stop.
The missing half of every bullet. The player below is queued to 2:52, the exact moment Ethan Evans says it. Watch on YouTube.
"People miss this in interviews when they're answering, and they miss it in resumes when they're writing. Your result is what I'm hiring you for. I'm hiring you for your result. What was your result in this? If you can say saved 25 million, great. If you can say did it three months faster than previous implementations of this scale, great."
That's the whole rewrite in one sentence. A hiring manager can hand those tasks to anyone. What they're paying for is the outcome you produced with them. So every bullet needs to answer a question that most bullets never get to: what was different afterward?
Evans has a blunt name for the lines that skip it. Going through a resume from a Harvard graduate applying to director of mergers and acquisitions roles, he hit a bullet about "sourcing and executing mergers and acquisitions while cultivating highly strategic partnerships to create vertically integrated capabilities and IP" and called it happy talk.
Happy talk. The player below is queued to 17:34, the exact moment Ethan Evans explains what's wrong with it. Watch on YouTube.
"The problem is it doesn't say anything. It doesn't make a statement about the results that were accomplished. It's, well, you know, I worked on M&A and I cultivate highly strategic partnerships. Who couldn't say that? How do I prove or disprove that?"
A few minutes later in the same review he gave the test in a single question: "what job couldn't this be written about?" He then proved the point by rewriting one of the bullets to describe his stepson's job at McDonald's, which worked fine. Run that test on your own lines. If a bullet could sit on the resume of someone two levels below you at a different company, it's telling the reader nothing.
What a strong bullet contains
Four things, in roughly this order.
The four parts
- An action verb you own. Built, cut, launched, negotiated, rewrote, consolidated. Not "responsible for" and not "helped with."
- The specific thing. Not "a system" but "the invoice reconciliation pipeline." Being specific is what makes a reader believe you were there.
- The result, with a number where one exists. Time saved, money made, error rate dropped, customers added, cycle shortened.
- A hint of how, if there's room. One clause that shows the judgment involved and gives the interviewer something to ask about.
Reviewing a resume that got its owner a job, Evans said the thing he liked most was that every single bullet opened with a verb: owned, streamlined, delivered, managed, improved, conducted. His read on it was "this is someone who gets shit done," and his guess was that the verbs are what got the interview.
One more constraint worth knowing before you start. Asked how many bullets a job should get, Evans said he has no idea what the right number is, but the key is to "drive to the point": what you were responsible for, what you did, what results and value you created, what skills you learned. If your bullets run several lines each, you need fewer of them, and one-line bullets let you run a few more. Length follows from how fast each line gets to the point.
Rewriting ten real bullets
The patterns below cover almost every weak bullet we see. Find yours, then copy the shape of the rewrite.
Bullets that only describe the job you were given
Release management
- Before: Responsible for managing the release process for the mobile application.
- After: Cut the mobile release cycle from three weeks to five days by automating the regression suite, taking the team from 17 releases a year to 41.
- What changed: The before could be written by anyone who's ever held the release calendar. The after says what the process looked like when you found it and what it looked like when you left.
Support
- Before: Handled escalated customer support tickets and worked with engineering on bug fixes.
- After: Rebuilt the escalation path between support and engineering, dropping average time to resolution on P1 tickets from 4 days to 19 hours across roughly 300 tickets a quarter.
- What changed: Everyone in that seat works with engineering. Rebuilding the path is the part that was yours.
Analytics
- Before: Built dashboards and reports for the sales organization.
- After: Replaced 14 hand-maintained spreadsheets with one pipeline feeding the sales dashboard, giving 60 reps live pipeline numbers and returning about six hours a week to the ops team.
- What changed: Same work, but the after tells you what people can do now that they couldn't do before.
Bullets that stop just before the result
These are the near misses. There's real work described, the verb is fine, and then the sentence ends right where the interesting part starts. Evans hit one of these on the M&A resume, a bullet that said "aimed at" a revenue target, and stopped cold on it: "Aimed at? Does that mean you did it or not? What were the results? I'm gonna hire somebody who gets results."
Migration
- Before: Led the migration of 15,000 machines to the new imaging platform.
- After: Led the migration of 15,000 machines to a new imaging platform, finishing three weeks early with zero unplanned downtime and 97% first-pass image accuracy.
- What changed: The before attaches a great number to the task. The after attaches numbers to the outcome, which is what they're hiring for.
Hiring
- Before: Ran hiring for the platform team, interviewing candidates and managing the process.
- After: Ran hiring for the platform team, growing it from 4 to 11 engineers in nine months with everyone still there a year later.
- What changed: Running a process is something anyone can claim. Growing the team and keeping it together is what the process was for.
Roadmap
- Before: Owned the roadmap for the billing product.
- After: Owned the billing roadmap and shipped usage-based pricing, which moved 22% of the customer base onto higher-value plans in two quarters.
- What changed: Owning a roadmap is just the job title written out. What shipped and what it did afterward is the actual work.
Bullets that hide behind big words
Partnerships
- Before: Cultivated strategic partnerships to drive vertically integrated capabilities across the portfolio.
- After: Signed three distribution partnerships, including one with a top-five retailer, which added $8M in first-year revenue.
- What changed: Evans's fix for exactly this line was to name the companies and say whether a deal got signed. Named things are checkable, so people believe them.
Transformation
- Before: Drove digital transformation initiatives to optimize operational efficiency enterprise-wide.
- After: Moved order entry from paper to a web form across 12 warehouses, cutting order errors from 6% to under 1% and saving about $400K a year in reshipments.
- What changed: "Digital transformation" could mean anything. The rewrite says what it was like before and what it was like after, so the reader can picture the work.
Stakeholders
- Before: Managed cross-functional stakeholders to ensure alignment on key deliverables.
- After: Got legal, security, and three engineering teams to agree on a single data retention standard, unblocking a launch that had slipped twice.
- What changed: Nobody can see alignment. The launch that finally went out is the thing that happened because you were there.
Leadership
- Before: Provided leadership and mentorship to junior team members.
- After: Mentored four junior analysts, three of whom were promoted within 18 months, and wrote the onboarding guide the team still uses.
- What changed: Someone can check those promotions and go read that guide. Nobody can check "provided mentorship."
How to find the number when you think you don't have one
Most people say their work can't be measured. Usually they've just never sat down and looked for a number. Evans ran into this on a senior product manager's resume, where one bullet happened to mention a billion in revenue and the rest said nothing about outcomes at all.
Asking for the result on every line. The player below is queued to 8:22, the exact moment Ethan Evans asks for it. Watch on YouTube.
"The other thing I wish I had on your PM stuff is what was the impact of what you did. This one generates a billion in revenue, that's incredible. What did this one do? What did some of these others accomplish? So like, when you own this roadmap, what was the result? I'm looking for result."
Work through these questions on each piece of work. One of them almost always produces something.
Questions that shake a number loose
- How long did this take before, and how long does it take now?
- How many of the thing? Customers, tickets, releases, markets, machines, dollars, people.
- How often did it break, and how often does it break now?
- What did someone stop doing because of this, and how many hours a week was that?
- Did revenue, retention, conversion, or cost move? By how much, over what period?
- How many people used it, and how many use it now?
- What would have happened if nobody had done this?
Where to go looking
- Old dashboards, tickets, and pull requests with dates on them.
- Your past performance reviews and the self-reviews you wrote.
- Slack messages where someone thanked you, which usually name the thing that got better.
- The launch email or the postmortem, which almost always has the before and after in it.
- Colleagues who were there. Ask them what changed after you did the work.
If this feels uncomfortable, you're not the only one. Plenty of people go blank here because writing down their own results feels like bragging. Deb Liu hears it constantly when she asks people about their self-reviews, and her answer reframes the whole exercise.
Education instead of self-promotion. The player below is queued to 39:43, the exact moment Deb Liu reframes it. Watch on YouTube.
"If you think your self-review is self-promotion, you're just not going to do a great job at it. What if I called it educating your manager about all the great work your team has been doing? What if I called it helping people see why your team should get more resources? Suddenly you're changing the question."
The same reframe works on a resume. You're telling someone who wasn't there what happened, which is a different job from talking yourself up. If you keep a running record of your results during the year, this whole section takes twenty minutes instead of a weekend. The evidence log in our raise playbook is the version we recommend keeping, and it feeds your resume, your self-review, and your promotion case from one place.
Find the bullet that stops one step short
Work Coach records you telling the story behind a bullet and marks where you stopped at the task. It asks what a hiring manager would ask, so you find the weak number first.
Start Free Trial2-week trial, no credit card needed. Your data is never shared with your employer.
Make the numbers believable
Numbers do two jobs on a resume. They tell the reader the size of what you did, and they show that you're the kind of person who knows their own results. Evans made the second point on a resume packed with specific figures.
Why specific figures work. The player below is queued to 4:09, the exact moment Ethan Evans explains it. Watch on YouTube.
"He has a lot of numbers in here. So if you look at his very first bullet, which is fantastic, numbers equals facts. They're believable, they show credibility. So when he says including 70 plus subsystems, managing 4,180 control system signals, he might be making that up. I don't think so knowing Kevin, but it sounds credible."
Elsewhere he explains why this works: people believe numbers on resumes because they seem verifiable. He could call your old employer and ask whether you really managed $400M in acquisitions, and they'd say yes or no. He probably won't call. The fact that he could is why people trust a number and skim past an adjective.
Which means the rules for using numbers are mostly about staying defensible.
Rules for numbers
- Every number has to survive a follow-up question. Assume you'll be asked how you got it.
- Approximate honestly when you have to. "About 200 customers" and "roughly 40 releases a year" are fine. A precise figure you can't back up is worse than a rounded one you can.
- Give the baseline where you have it. "From 6% to under 1%" beats "reduced errors significantly," and it beats a bare "1% error rate" too.
- Don't claim credit for a whole team's number as if it were yours. Say what you owned inside it.
- Percentages need a denominator somewhere nearby, or a reader assumes the base was tiny.
- Two or three strong numbers per role beat a number crammed into every line.
Show scope and judgment when there's no metric
Some real work doesn't produce a number. Compliance work and early research often don't, and neither does a rewrite that prevented problems nobody ever saw. Those bullets still have to show impact, so show it a different way.
Scope tells the reader how big the thing was. Team size, budget, number of markets, systems touched, revenue supported, how many people depended on it. "Owned the data retention policy for 12 systems and about 4 million user records" says plenty with no outcome metric at all.
Naming the hard call is how you show judgment. Name the tradeoff you chose and what it cost. "Cut two of five planned features to hold the launch date, and shipped on schedule" tells a hiring manager more about your seniority than most metrics do.
Firsts and durability both count. "First security review process the company had," or "the runbook the on-call team still uses three years later." If something you built is still in use after you left, that counts as evidence.
Recognition counts when it's specific. Someone asked you to run the next one, pulled you onto the escalation, or handed you the account. Say who asked and what for.
What doesn't work is dressing up a metric-free bullet with adjectives. "Successfully delivered a highly complex initiative" adds nothing that "delivered the initiative" didn't already say. When you catch yourself reaching for an adjective, go find a fact instead. This matters most in senior roles, where how you position the level of work you do is doing as much for you as the numbers are.
What to cut
Evans's standard for the whole document is that every line has to earn the reader reading on. Anything that doesn't is taking space from something that would.
Cut these
- "Responsible for" openers. Every one of them. Rewrite with the verb for what you actually did.
- Duties that come with the title. A program manager who "ran standups and tracked dependencies" has told the reader nothing they didn't assume.
- Intensifier adjectives. Successfully, highly, extensively, significantly, world-class, cutting-edge. They're claims without evidence and readers skip them.
- Insider vocabulary. Evans flagged "manager of VIP team online, ring games and sit-and-go tournaments" as inside baseball that meant nothing outside poker. If a stranger in your industry wouldn't parse it, translate it.
- Long paragraph summaries. He skipped straight past one and said so: people read bullets.
- Tool lists you'd hate to be quizzed on. Every tool you list is a question you invited.
- Old roles at full length. Anything past about ten years gets one line.
Cutting has a second benefit. The bullets you keep are the ones the interviewer asks about, which means cutting is how you steer the conversation. Our resume tailoring playbook covers picking those three or four stories first and then editing the file to point at them.
Check your bullets against the stories you'll tell
A bullet is a promise that you can talk about the work for two minutes. So the last check is to say each one out loud.
Take your five strongest bullets and, for each one, tell the story behind it: what the situation was, what you did, what happened, and what you'd do differently. If you can't get through it, either the bullet is overstated or you haven't thought about the work since you did it. Either one is worth fixing now, because you won't get the chance once you're in the interview. Ipsen watches senior candidates figure this out far too late.
Practicing before the tenth interview. The player below is queued to 54:24, the exact moment Lauren Ipsen says it. Watch on YouTube.
"So often people don't do that, especially when they're not looking for jobs. And then it's not until their tenth interview that they know how to tell their story and what they did and what they impacted and why they were someone to be missed when they moved on."
"Someone to be missed" is a good phrase to write bullets against. If a line describes work that would have happened anyway without you, it isn't earning its space. Once the spoken versions are solid, the behavioral interview playbook covers structuring them for "tell me about a time" questions, so the same evidence carries your resume and your answers.
Frequently asked questions
How many bullets should each job get?
Evans says there's no ideal number and the real constraint is how fast each line gets to the point. In practice: four to six for your current role, three to four for the one before, one or two for anything older than about ten years. Long multi-line bullets mean you need fewer of them.
What if my results took a whole team?
Most results do, and hiring managers know that. Name the team result and your specific part in it. "Grew the team from 4 to 11 engineers" as the hiring lead is honest even though you weren't the only interviewer. What you can't do is present a team number in a way that implies you did all of it, because that unravels in the first follow-up question.
Is it a problem if I can't share exact figures?
No, and plenty of people can't for confidentiality reasons. Use ratios and relative movement: "cut processing time by 60%," "doubled the active user base," "top quartile of the sales org." Evans reviewed a resume where the person had swapped real figures for XX placeholders and treated that as perfectly fine.
Should the bullet include the whole story?
No. Give the result and one clause about how, then stop. A bullet that explains everything leaves the interviewer nothing to ask, and the questions you invite are the ones you've prepared for.
What about a first job with no real results yet?
Use scope, speed, and firsts. How many of something you handled, how quickly you were given work above your level, anything you built that people still use. Coursework and projects count if you say what came of them, though they should drop off once you have a year of real work.
Do these bullets work for LinkedIn too?
Mostly yes, with one adjustment. LinkedIn is read by people who aren't screening you for a specific job, so lead with the two or three results that make someone want to message you, and keep the rest shorter than on the resume.
The rewrite on one page
First pass
- Mark every bullet that starts with "responsible for," "managed," "worked on," or "helped."
- On each one, ask what job couldn't this be written about. If the answer is none, rewrite it.
- Give every bullet an action verb you can defend.
Finding the results
- Ask the before-and-after questions on each piece of work: how long, how many, how often, what stopped.
- Dig through old dashboards, reviews, launch emails, and thank-you messages.
- Ask two colleagues what changed after you did the work.
- Where there's genuinely no metric, show scope, the tradeoff you chose, or something that outlived you.
Tightening
- Two or three strong numbers per role, each one defensible under a follow-up question.
- Cut intensifier adjectives, insider vocabulary, duties that come with the title, and tools you'd rather not be asked about.
- Give the result plus one clause about how, and save the rest for the interview.
Last check
- Tell the two-minute story behind your five strongest bullets out loud.
- Fix any bullet you couldn't talk through, either by cutting it or by remembering the work properly.
- Confirm your strongest result is the first bullet under your current title.
Sources
- Level Up: Real Resume Review: Technical Program Manager (Oct 2020)
- Level Up: Real Resume Review: Harvard Graduate, Director Merger & Acquisitions (Sep 2020)
- Level Up: Real Resume Review: Senior Product Manager (Sep 2020)
- Level Up: Create a Bold Resume: Real Life Example (Oct 2020)
- Lenny's Podcast: Succeeding as an introvert, building zero-to-one, and PM'ing your career like a product, with Deb Liu (Aug 2024)
- Lenny's Podcast: Lessons from one of the world's top executive recruiters, with Lauren Ipsen (Nov 2022)